Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76396078?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76396078. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns IF OUR DONUTS WERE ANY BETTER, THEY WOULD BE CRIMINAL?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76396078, the listed owner(s) include: Brand, John, Brand, John.

What is the current status of IF OUR DONUTS WERE ANY BETTER, THEY WOULD BE CRIMINAL?

IF OUR DONUTS WERE ANY BETTER, THEY WOULD BE CRIMINAL (76396078) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover IF OUR DONUTS WERE ANY BETTER, THEY WOULD BE CRIMINAL?

The public record lists International Classes: 030, 043. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: IF OUR DONUTS WERE ANY BETTER, THEY WOULD BE CRIMINAL Serial# 76396078 | status 606; last event CORV | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

Q: What is USPTO serial number 76396078?

Serial number 76396078 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark IF OUR DONUTS WERE ANY BETTER, THEY WOULD BE CRIMINAL. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IF OUR DONUTS WERE ANY BETTER, THEY WOULD BE CRIMINAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Brand, John
Redwood City, CA
Other trademarks owned by Brand, John
Brand, John
Redwood City, CA
Other trademarks owned by Brand, John

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Tall

BOZICEVIC, FIELD & FRANCIS LLP1900 UNIVERSITY AVE STE 200EAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
030	Donuts; coffee; tea; cocoa; cookies; cakes; pies; muffins; plain, glazed, coated and filled fried cakes; custard and pudding based fillings for donuts, cookies, cakes and pies	ACTIVE	—
043	Restaurant and carry-out food services	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jun 3, 2006	CORV	REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE	—
May 12, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Dec 13, 2005	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2005	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 8, 2005	EX4G	SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED	—
Apr 8, 2005	EXT4	SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED	—
Apr 8, 2005	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 21, 2005	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Oct 8, 2004	EX3G	SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED	—
Oct 1, 2004	EXT3	SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED	—
Oct 1, 2004	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 28, 2004	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Apr 26, 2004	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Apr 14, 2004	CFIT	CASE FILE IN TICRS	—
Apr 6, 2004	EX2G	SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	—
Apr 6, 2004	EXT2	SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED	—
Apr 6, 2004	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2003	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
Oct 2, 2003	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
Oct 2, 2003	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 8, 2003	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 14, 2003	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 25, 2002	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Aug 26, 2002	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Aug 20, 2002	CNEA	EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED	—
Jul 31, 2002	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—

IF OUR DONUTS WERE ANY BETTER, THEY WOULD BE CRIMINAL