USPTO serial 76396171
LENTHERIC LONDON PARIS FLEUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LENTHERIC LONDON PARIS FLEUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Watford, Hertfordshire WD24 7JG, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Bruce Prout
D BRUCE PROUT CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SOAPS FOR PERSONAL USE; PERFUMERY; FRAGRANCES FOR PERSONAL USE; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; COSMETICS; HAIR LOTIONS; EAU DE TOILETTE; TALCUM POWDER; BODY SPRAYS; SHOWER GELS; DENTIFRICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 24, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |