Drawing for PROJECT SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 76397208

PROJECT SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROJECT SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dickson M. Lupo

Dickson M. Lupo Moore & Van Allen PLLC100 North Tryon Street, Suite 4700Charlotte, NC 28202-4003UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal goods namely television wall mounts; metal doors, metal door accessories and door hardware, namely door handles, door knockers, door locks, keys and key cylinders; shelving hardware, namely wall-mounted rails, shelving brackets and shelving supports; gate hardware, namely metal gate hinges, metal gate handles and metal gate locks; metal hinges; metal mailboxes, metal posts, metal mending plates, metal picture hangers, wire, screen wire, metal scaffolding, metal pump jacks being component parts of metal scaffolding, metal sky lights, closet accessories, namely, metal closet hooks and hook and loop fasteners for storage purposes, metal baskets for storage; non-luminous and non-mechanical metal signs, metal house numbers and letters; metal molding, metal pet doors; metal stair treadsACTIVE—
009Luminous signsACTIVE—
014CLOCKSACTIVE—
016Wall decor items, namely framed art prints; coasters made of paperACTIVE—
018Tote bagsACTIVE—
019Wood trim; non-metal sky lights, non-metal millwork exclusive of cabinets; non-metal window shutters and doors; fireplace mantels; wood moldings; non-metal posts, non-metal scaffoldingACTIVE—
020Furniture and furnishings, namely accent furniture, bedroom furniture, cabinets, kitchen furniture, kitchen cabinets, counter tops, home office furniture, casual dining furniture, entertainment stands, entertainment centers, folding tables, folding chairs, bar stools, book cases, non-metal shelving hardware, wire shelves, ready-to-finish furniture, bathroom furniture, bathroom cabinets, medicine cabinets; metal garment racks for storage, furniture parts, namely, drawer slides, doors for armoires and cabinet doors, vanity tops; non-metal window and door trim; furniture molding, wood door and window trim, wooden dowels; non-metal television wall mounts; non-metal fireplace tool wall brackets; pet products, namely, pet furniture, namely portable beds for pets; play-houses for pets, portable pet kennels; non-metal mailboxes; non-metal house numbers and letters; non-metal stair parts, namely stair treadsACTIVE—
021Garbage cans, trash cans and waste baskets; pet perches; garment drying racks; cages for pets; coasters not of paper and not being table linenACTIVE—
022Garment bags for storage; laundry bagsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 10, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 10, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 12, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 12, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 10, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 10, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 18, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 4, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 26, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 26, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 30, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 3, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 15, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 29, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 25, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance