Drawing for SMART SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 76397227

SMART SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHAN, ASMAT A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cory M. Amron

CORY M AMRON VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE, LLP1828 L ST NW 11TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031grass seed, flower seeds, vegetable seeds, plant seeds, raw bark, namely, pine bark and pine nuggets; pine mulch, cedar mulch, hardwood mulch, root mulch, cypress mulch, grass products, namely, grass sod and grass plugs, top soil, peat moss, compost, lawn seed, live plants and containers therefor; plant products, namely living transgenic plants and transgenic plant seedsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 22, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 22, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 7, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 29, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 8, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 22, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 11, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance