USPTO serial 76397829
CANDY LAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CANDY LAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pawtucket, RI
Pawtucket, RI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of motion pictures films, television programs, television game shows and cartoon show series; television series in the nature of children's game and entertainment; providing interactive computer games by means of a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |