USPTO serial 76398145
FILTERTOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FILTERTOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheldon R. Meyer
SHELDON R MEYER FLIESLER DUBB MEYER & LOVEJOY LLPFOUR EMBARCADERO CTR FOURTH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4156UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical preparations for use in the preservation of foodstuffs; chemical preparations for the purpose of affecting the freshness and/or the ripening rate of foodstuffs | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Food preservation filters which affect the freshness and/or ripening rate of foodstuffs | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Containers, canisters, bags, stand-alone units, refrigerator compartments, all with a holder which accepts a replaceable filter which affects the freshness and/or the ripening rate of foodstuffs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 14, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |