USPTO serial 76398258
SOCCER HEROES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOCCER HEROES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wolverhampton, West Midlands, GB
Wolverhampton, West Midlands, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nickolas C. Ekonomides
BARRY CROCKETT (MR.) SOCCER HEROES56 MAYFIELD RD E PARKWOLVERHAMPTON, KINGDOM WV1 2EA CAUNITED KINGDOMGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant/bar services with sports theme | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 11, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |