USPTO serial 76398322
AKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Owen Sound, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education services, namely diagnostic training about the programming, design, development, use and employment of computer programs and software in the marine and systems engineering fields; general client training in computer information design applications; and in-service training focusing on the development of logical problem-solving and problem analysis for engineering control systems. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Developing, applying, managing, supporting and maintaining solutions for clients' engineering needs, namely, design engineering, engineering process control, engineering functional specification development, electrical, mechanical and marine engineering, and information management as related to these engineering projects; computer systems test development; provision of services for execution of these computer systems tests, namely, SubSea Blow Off Preventer (BOP) and well control automated test system development, development of automated electrical system test equipment for use in complex control systems, development of integrated electronic circuit designs for testing of electro-mechanical systems health, and development of data capture and statistical analysis utilities designed to substantiate and support decisions required for operation of highly sensitive environmental and safety-critical control systems; provision and implementation of data management services and applications, namely, development, application and management of tools utilized to bind engineering and control system data imbedded within or derived from the process to project and plant management data critical to efficient project management or plant operation; installation, implementation, maintenance and updating of existing computer programs used by others in the marine and systems engineering fields; provision of troubleshooting services and engineered solutions for existing control system problems or design problems not yet commissioned, namely, in the fields of industrial control systems specifically in the marine and off-shore industries, installation management, commissioning and testing services, engineering design review and post delivery performance testing; and multi-media information design services in the marine and off-shore industries, namely customized computer based training systems, installation specific electronic documentation systems; design of virtual plant mockups tied to plant specific data such as providing system and device information and documentation prompted from plant virtual tours; research, development and testing in the field of automation and control systems programming and software in International Class 42. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |