Drawing for EMRYS

USPTO serial 76398346

EMRYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMRYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary D. Krugman

GARY D KRUGMAN SUGHRUE MION. PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical reagents for industrial and scientific research use; chemicals used in the manufacture of medical and veterinary preparationsACTIVE—
009Scientific, electric, electronic and optical apparatus and instruments, namely, apparatus and instruments for performing chemical reactions using microwaves, for use in the planning, preparing, carrying out, documenting, measuring, checking and analyzing of chemical reactions; laboratory apparatus and instruments, namely, apparatus and instruments for performing chemical reactions using microwaves, for use in the planning, preparing, carrying out, documenting, measuring, checking and analyzing of chemical reactions; and computer software for use in the planning, preparing, carrying out, documenting, measuring, checking and analyzing of chemical reactions; and microwave ovens for laboratory useACTIVE—
011Microwave heaters for heating and initiating a chemical reaction in a reactorACTIVE—
042Research and development of new products for others in the field of chemistry; consultancy in field of chemistry; licensing of intellectual property pertaining to the field of chemistry; chemical analysis and researchACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 31, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 11, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 15, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 30, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance