USPTO serial 76398439
MNEM-IX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MNEM-IX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Havant Hants P09 2NL, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslye B. Davidson, Esq.
LESLYE B DAVIDSON ESQ DAVIDSON, DAVIDSON & KAPPEL, LLC485 SEVENTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for effecting deposition under vacuum of a thin layer of material on a substrate; machines for the production of magnetic structures; machines for the production of MRAM; machines adapted for operation under vacuum for use in the manufacture of devices incorporating coating; machines for etching; machines for thin film deposition; machines for oxidation of an ultra thin metallic film; parts and fittings for the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Scientific apparatus for use in vacuum deposition of a thin layer of material on a substrate; scientific apparatus for the production of magnetic structures; scientific apparatus for the production of MRAM; scientific apparatus adapted for the operation under vacuum for use in the manufacture of devices incorporating a magnetic coating; ion beam sources; apparatus incorporating ion beam sources; vacuum sputtering apparatus; control apparatus for use with the aforesaid; vacuum pumps; current neutralisers, electronic power supply devices; gas metering devices; vacuum measuring devices; scientific apparatus for etching; scientific apparatus for thin film deposition; scientific apparatus for oxidation of an ultra thin metallic film; parts and fittings for the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | design services and consulting services relating to deposition of coatings under high vacuum conditions for the maintenance of equipment therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |