USPTO serial 76398895
PAVIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PAVIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol L. B. Matthews
CAROL L B MATTHEWS HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWSTE 100WASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Stereo apparatus, namely audio amplifiers and audio receivers, personal stereos, stereo receivers and stereo tuners; radio receiving sets; tape recorders, namely audio tape recorders and video tape recorders; tapeplayers, namely audio tape players and video tape players; compact disc (CD) players, compact disc (CD) recorders (CD-R); mini disc (MD) players, mini disc (MD) recorders; personal stereo and car radio-cassette recorders; tuners, namely radio tuners, television tuners; amplifiers, audio speakers, headphones, microphones, television receiving sets, video tape recorders, video tape players, digital video disc (DVD) players, digital video disc (DVD) recorders, liquid crystal screens for display of DVDs; unrecorded compact discs, mini discs, and digital discs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SONY KABUSHIKI KAISHA (A/T/A SONY CORPORATION)
- Other trademarks owned by Aiwa Co., Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Aiwa Co., Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PAVIT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |