USPTO serial 76399010
SMARTCLICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3202465Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 2007
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMARTCLICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas D. Drescher,
THOMAS D. DRESCHER ADVENT TECHNOLOGY, INC.301 BRANNAN STREET6TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, software for the purpose of enabling navigation, and the transportation of data, among and between disparate software applications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Advent Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Advent Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ADVENT SOFTWARE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ADVENT SOFTWARE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SMARTCLICK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 28, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 6, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |