USPTO serial 76399268
TEA & TEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TEA & TEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Lee
DAVID J LEE CHAN, LEE & CHEUNG, PLLC401 BROADWAY STE 1708RK, NY 10013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | fruit-based snack food, soy-based snack food; potato-based snack food | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 2002 |
| 030 | tea, iced tea, herbal tea, shakes, coffee | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 2002 |
| 032 | soft drinks flavored with tea, smoothies, fruit based soft drinks flavored with tea | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 2002 |
| 043 | cafe, food preparation, restaurant, snack bar | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Yeung, Kenneth S.
- Other trademarks owned by Yeung, Kenneth S.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named TEA & TEA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2002 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |