USPTO serial 76399306
CU24
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CU24?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Bacon
JEFFREY O DAVIDSON DRBAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ 130 E RANDOLPHCHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | financial management and computerized electronic funds transfer ("EFT") services, namely, offering automated teller machine and point-of-sale network services for credit unions, other financial institutions, merchants, processors and other entities, which permit credit union and other financial institution customers to remotely access their accounts; providing reciprocal interchange arrangements with other EFT networks; and providing ancillary services such as provisioning with encoding plastic cards, and provisioning ATM supplies; and providing all other EFT services which providers of EFT services are authorized to provide, namely, scrip and scrip terminals, prepaid cards, smart cards and providing EFT services via a global communications network | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |