Drawing for SAKO

USPTO serial 76399689

SAKO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2826949Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 30, 2004
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with SAKO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julianne A. Henley

Julianne A. Henley Perkins Coie LLP1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900Seattle, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Training services in the field of comprehensive security programsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDApr 11, 1974
042Planning, developing and designing security management and enterprise-wide technical security systems; integrating security systems with fire protection and other building systems; monitoring the installation and operational testing of installed physical and technical security systemsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDApr 11, 1974
045Security consulting services, namely, evaluating security measures, systems and procedures to identify their strengths, weaknesses and vulnerabilities; developing security plans to maximize force protection and physical security features at building sites; creating action plans for disaster and emergency events; and periodic performance assessments of comprehensive security systems identified herewithSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDApr 11, 1974

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2014CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Dec 4, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2010C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 5, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 23, 2010E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 17, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 7, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 29, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance