USPTO serial 76399742
SEVENTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2007
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SEVENTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
30030 Martellago (VE), IT
30030 Martellago (VE), IT
SCORZE' (VE), IT
SCORZE' (VE), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
NICHOLAS D. WELLS Legends Law Group330 N. Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, [VESTS,] PULLOVERS, [SWEATSHIRTS,] SUSPENDERS AND FOULARDS, SHIRTS, [WAISTCOATS], TROUSERS, SKIRTS, MEN'S SUITS AND WOMEN'S DRESSES, JACKETS, HEAVY JACKETS, OVERCOATS, TOP-COATS,[ CLOAKS, RAINCOATS, WIND-RESISTANT JACKETS, STOCKINGS, SOCKS, GYMSUITS], BELTS,[ TIES, GLOVES, ]SCARVES; [FOOTWEAR,] HEADWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CA'DA MOSTO Srl
- Other trademarks owned by CA'DA MOSTO Srl
- Other trademarks owned by CA'DA MOSTO S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by CA'DA MOSTO S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SEVENTY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 31, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 31, 2018 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 23, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 14, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 11, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2007 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |