USPTO serial 76399771
SCHWAN'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCHWAN'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory C. Golla
GREGORY C GOLLA MERCHANT & GOULDP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Food product catalog | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Frozen food products, namely, processed seafood; processed shrimp; processed fruits and vegetables; potatoes stuffed with sour cream, bacon pieces, and chives; creamed chipped beef; beef tips and gravy; chicken and gravy; processed onion rings; entrees consisting primarily of meat or poultry and vegetables; processed foods, namely, processed poultry, processed meat, cheese slices, processed cheese, processed potatoes, and chicken, chili and cheese entrees; milk; frozen prepared entrees consisting primarily of chicken, turkey, pork, meatloaf, or fish and containing one or more of the following-- processed potatoes, processed vegetables, biscuits, rolls, rice, or egg rolls; goulash consisting primarily of hamburger, and also containing pasta and tomato sauce; corn dogs | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Pasta and pasta entrees, including, vegetable pasta entrees; goulash consisting primarily of pasta, and also containing hamburger and tomato sauce; frozen food products, namely, egg rolls; Mexican food products, namely, taquitos, tamales, burritos and enchiladas; prepared entrees consisting of meat, cheese, or vegetables on a corn-meal crust; frozen prepared entrees consisting primarily of pasta, and also containing one or more of the following-- rolls, rice, egg rolls, processed potatoes, processed vegetables, cake, cheesecake, or dessert pies consisting primarily of puddings or custard; lasagna; ravioli; tortellini; pasta shells stuffed with cheese; pancakes; waffles; French toast sticks; cookie dough; cinnamon roll dough; fruit pies; apple flautas; sandwiches, including, sandwiches consisting of ham and cheese; entrees consisting primarily of rice, and also containing meat or poultry and vegetables; pretzels stuffed with cheese or peanut butter and jelly; bread dough; bread, including, cheese garlic bread, stuffed bread and pre-cooked, ready-to-eat frozen bread with meat, cheese, sauce or vegetable filling; croissants; pizza; ice cream, ice cream-based desserts, frozen ice milk, frozen yogurt, frozen sherbet and frozen ice cream confections, frozen yogurt confections, frozen ice milk confections and frozen sherbet confections; and chocolate topping; pierogies | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Concentrates used in the preparation of fruit-flavored and fruit juice drinks containing water; and orange juice | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Mobile retail food store services utilizing trucks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Schwan's IP LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Schwan's IP LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SCHWAN'S
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |