USPTO serial 76399847
SYNCROS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SYNCROS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Recreational Technologies Incorporated (RTI)
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by Recreational Technologies Incorporated (RTI)
Recreational Technologies Incorporated (RTI)
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by Recreational Technologies Incorporated (RTI)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirsten Severson
KIRSTEN SEVERSON KLS TRADEMARK SERVICESPO BOX 19126, 4TH AVE POSTVANCOUVER, BC V6K 4R8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | bicycle components and accessories, namely, handlebars, handlebar stems, handlebar ends, brake cable hangers, seat posts, bottom brackets, crank sets, crank bolts, brake pads, tires, pedals, rims, chains, saddles, bicycle pumps, bicycle bells and bicycle frames, bicycle tools, namely, and tire patches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Recreational Technologies Incorporated (RTI)
- Other trademarks owned by Recreational Technologies Incorporated (RTI)
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named SYNCROS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |