USPTO serial 76399854
IBAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3081105Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 18, 2006
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IBAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
2206 KONGSVINGER, NO
2206 KONGSVINGER, NO
2206 KONGSVINGER, NO
NEW YORK, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anna W. Manville
Anna W. Manville Arnold & Porter LLP555 12th Street, N.W.IP DocketingWashington, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Registration No 218011) Computer software for erasing information stored on storage media; software for recovery of data on storage media; software for erasing information on storage media and user manuals sold together as a unit; software for securing and analyzing data in relation to computer forensic services; computer hardware, namely degaussers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | (Based on Registration No 168732) De-installation, maintenance and repair of computers for others; securing and analyzing data in relation to computer forensic services; Installation of computers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | (Based on Registration No 168732) Computer programming; development, design, maintenance and updating of software for erasing information from storage medias and software for the repair of computers and storage medias and software for data recovery and software for securing and analyzing data in relation to computer forensic services; testing of computer programs and computer related material; data recovery services; consultant services regarding data security, data recovery and computer quality control; computer forensic services; installation computer programs for others; de-installation, maintenance and repair of computer programs for others; securing and analyzing data in relation to computer forensic services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IBAS AS
- Other trademarks owned by IBAS AS
- Other trademarks owned by IBAS AS
- Other trademarks owned by KROLL INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IBAS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 10, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |