USPTO serial 76400174
SMARTSCREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTSCREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Galbally, Dungannon Co. Tyronne, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie Meyer-Leon
LESLIE MEYER-LEON ESQ IP LEGAL STRATEGIES GROUP PC1480 FALMOUTH RDPO BOX 1210CENTERVILLE, MA 02632-1210Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic systems for remote or local monitor and control of material filter and separator machines, sold individually or as bundled or integrated systems, namely, computer monitors, computer key pads, computer displays, computer cursor controllers, electrical controllers; computer software that is embedded in or for installation in an electrical controller that controls or monitors those components of filtering and separating machines consisting of valves, pumps, sensors, motors, drive tracks, track mounts, wheels, wheeled bogies, brakes, shredders, diesel engines, exhaust systems consisting primarily of manifolds, pipes, mufflers, vibrating grids, chutes, hoppers, ignition parts, namely ignition keys, ignition switches, ignition batteries, and ignition starters, casting plates, tipping grids, non-electronic temperature sensors, propulsion units, namely hydraulic drive motors, and conveyors; electronic temperature sensors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 26, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |