USPTO serial 76400223
MICRO 272
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 18, 2004
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MICRO 272?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chestnut Ridge, NY
Chestnut Ridge, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Rosenberg
MARK J ROSENBERG AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | TEXTILE FABRICS, COMPRISED IN WHOLE OR SIGNIFICANT PART OF FABRICS WITH A THREAD COUNT OF 272, FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF MEN'S SUITS, SPORT COATS AND TROUSERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 18, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |