USPTO serial 76400501
GMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn Morrow
LYNN MORROW STOKES BARTHOLOMEW EVANS & PETREE, PA901 18TH AVE SNASHVILLE, TN 37212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting seminars, exhibitions, conferences and workshops in the field of gospel music; entertainment services, namely, organizing and conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of gospel music shows; providing incentives to people to demonstrate excellence in the field of gospel music through the issuance of awards | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 24, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 24, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 7, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 6, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |