Drawing for PROTEINCHIP

USPTO serial 76400511

PROTEINCHIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROTEINCHIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARGARET C. MCHUGH,

MARGARET C MCHUGH TOWNSEND & TOWNSEND & CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Diagnostic medical reagents for medical researchACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 10, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 27, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance