USPTO serial 76400619
MARHABA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 9, 2005
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MARHABA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Richmond Hill, Ontario, CA
Richmond Hill, Ontario, CA
Richmond Hill, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dax Alvarez
Dax Alvarez BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD.7TH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1040Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | pre-paid telephone calling cards, not magnetically encoded; telephone calling cards not magnetically encoded | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 29, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gold Line Telemanagement Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Gold Line Telemanagement Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Gold Line Telemanagement Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named MARHABA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |