Drawing for TRIDENT XP4

USPTO serial 76400692

TRIDENT XP4

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2795756Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 16, 2003
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRIDENT XP4?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Lee

David W. Lee Law Offices of David W. Lee108 N. Ynez Ave., Suite 128Monterey Park, CA 91754UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Integrated circuits; video and graphics accelerator chips; software for controlling same and user manuals provided together therewith as a unitSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDNov 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2010C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Feb 26, 2010CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 3, 2010CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Oct 19, 2009PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 16, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 1, 2003CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Oct 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 3, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 27, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 18, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 18, 2003EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 18, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 18, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance