Drawing for SUNDAY COMICS CAPER

USPTO serial 76400826

SUNDAY COMICS CAPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUNDAY COMICS CAPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam D. Siegarted

JENIFER DE WOLF PAINE TRADEMARK FILE ROOM (18-106)PROSKAUER ROSE LLP1585 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10036-8299

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer games software; video game cartridges; toy magnetsACTIVE—
028toys and games, namely, action figures, balloons, bathtub toys, bean bags, board games, bubble making wand and solution sets, card games, dolls, dollhouses, egg decorating kits, flotation devices for recreational use, namely, swim floats, arm floats, and kickboards, flying discs, inflatable toys, jump ropes, kites, children's multiple activity toys, musical toys, toy noisemakers, party favors in the nature of small toys, playground balls, plush toys, punching bags, pumpkin decorating kits, puppets, manipulative puzzles, baby rattles, ride-on toys, roller skates, spinning tops, stuffed toy animals, swimming pool games and toys, namely, floating volleyball nets and volleyballs, floating basketball hoops and basketballs, water squirting toys, modeling toy clay sets, toy paint sets, toy vehicles, wind-up toys, yo-yos, toy lunch boxesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 3, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 26, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 29, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 30, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 5, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 2, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 2, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 4, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 18, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 3, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 11, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 2, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 1, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 7, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance