Drawing for CYNTELLECT

USPTO serial 76401072

CYNTELLECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BATTLE, KENNETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CYNTELLECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa M. Martens, Esq.

LISA M MARTENS ESQ COOLEY GODWARD LLP4401 EASTGATE MALLSAN DIEGO, CA 92121-1909UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005diagnostic reagents and assays for clinical or medical laboratory useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2004MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 10, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 23, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 23, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 8, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance