USPTO serial 76401134
JAQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JAQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Thornlands, Queensland 4164, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J. McKenna
RICHARD J MCKENNA FOLEY & LARDNERFIRSTAR CTR777 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202-5367Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hand operated tools and implements to lay and install floor coverings; blades; chisels; clamps; hand held cutting tools; knives; hand operated lifting jacks; nippers; pincers; pliers; hand held punches; reamers and hand held riverters; hand held riveting hammers; hand saws; scissors; shears; hand tools for stretching wire and metal bands | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Carts, tilting-carts and trolleys for transporting and dispensing carpet rolls and rolls of floor coverings | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesaling and retailing services for floor coverings, tools and equipment used to assist in the installation and laying of floor coverings and apparatus to transport and dispense rolls of floor coverings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |