USPTO serial 76401329
CYCOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2971368Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2005
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CYCOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
RICHMAN TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
SAN DIEGO, CA
RICHMAN TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
SAN DIEGO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard D. Clarke
RICHARD D CLARKE LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD D CLARKE3755 AVOCADO BLVD #1000LA MESA, CA 91941-7301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic security devices and systems, and facilities security and management software, namely, software to control building environmental systems, access and security systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2005 |
| 045 | Monitoring security systems and security guard services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Richman Management Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Richman Management Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by RICHMAN TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by RICHMAN TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named CYCOP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 9, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 2, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 10, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |