USPTO serial 76401394
TREKALLIANCEONLINE.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TREKALLIANCEONLINE.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Incline Village, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karin E. Peterka
KARIN E PETERKA BUCHALTER, NEMER, FIELDS & YOUNGER601 S FIGUEROA ST STE 2400LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-5704UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail services via the global computer network in the field of personal care products, cleaning products, nutrition and diet products, audio and video products, publications, water filtration products, clothing, advertising kits, educational programs and seminars, network marketing opportunities for self-employment, web page and global computer network service provider services, and telephone services; providing information by means of a global computer network and global telecommunications network in the field of personal care products, cleaning products, nutrition and diet products, audio and video products, publications, water filtration products, clothing, advertising kits, educational programs and seminars, network marketing opportunities for self-employment, web page and global computer network service provider services, and telephone services; business information and marketing services provided via a global computer network; promoting the goods and services of others by means of a global computer network and global telecommunications network, | ACTIVE | Nov 5, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |