Drawing for PALMSCOPE

USPTO serial 76401557

PALMSCOPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PALMSCOPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John H. Weber

JOHN H WEBER BAKER HOSTETLER LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, NWWASHINGTON SQ, STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5304

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic engine analysis system comprised of a hand-held computer and operating software thereforABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2007MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 5, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 19, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 4, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 19, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 19, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 19, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 27, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 26, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 8, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 6, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance