USPTO serial 76401711
RINGPROP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RINGPROP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St Lucia, Queensland, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay F. Moldovanyi
JAY F MOLDOVANYI FAY SHARPE BEALL FAGAN MINNICH & MCKEE1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Ringed marine propeller for inboard/outboard marine engines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |