USPTO serial 76401830
PERFORMANCE ENGINEERED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2805942Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 13, 2004
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PERFORMANCE ENGINEERED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard J. Klein
Howard J. Klein Klein, O'Neill & Singh, LLP18200 Von Karman AvenueSuite 725Irvine, CA 92612Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Devices for handling, securing and stowing cargo, namely, metal clamps, metal hooks, metal eyes and metal loading ramps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 10, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Keeper Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Keeper Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by HAMPTON PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named PERFORMANCE ENGINEERED
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 11, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |