Drawing for ELECTROSYNTHESIS

USPTO serial 76402601

ELECTROSYNTHESIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ELECTROSYNTHESIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ellen S. Simpson, Esq.

ELLEN S SIMPSON ESQ SIMPSON & SIMPSON, PLLC5555 MAIN STWILLIAMSVILLE, NY 14221UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical apparatus and instruments; electrochemical cells; energy storage plants; electricity storage apparatus; fuel cells; electrochemical processing plants; electrodes; scientific apparatus for use in water purification; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
016Printed matter and publications; books, magazines and journalsACTIVE—
037Installation, repair, maintenance and operation services for electrochemical cells, energy storage plants, fuel cells, electrochemical processing plants, apparatus and equipment electrodes and water purification apparatus; operation of electrochemical processing plants and electrochemical cells; energy storage plants and water purification plants for othersACTIVE—
041Educational services; organization of conferences and seminars for educational purposesACTIVE—
042Services relating to the installation, repair, maintenance and operation of electrochemical processing plants, energy storage plants, fuel cells, electrochemical processing plants, electrodes and water purification apparatus; research, design and consultancy services relating to all the aforesaid servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2002AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
May 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance