USPTO serial 76403111
HOME ON THE RANGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOME ON THE RANGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara J. Quinn
BARBARA J QUINN THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 S BUENA VISTA STBURBANK, CA 91521-0643UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair shampoo, hair conditioner, hair mousse, hair cream rinse, skin cleansing cream, facial, hand and body cream, facial, hand and body lotion, facial, hand and body moisturizer, scalp conditioner, bath oil, bath powder, body powder, perfume, cologne, aftershave, shaving cream and foam, bar soap, liquid soap, skin soap, mascara, lip stick, lip gloss, eyeliner, blush, rouge, eyeshadow, eyebrow pencils, nail polish, nail hardener, facial scrubs, facial masks, talcum powder, bubble bath, toilet water, dentifrices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |