USPTO serial 76403255
CUBA LIBRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 25, 2008
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with CUBA LIBRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
200 8th Avenue Restaurant Corp.
New York, NY
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Security Atlantic Leasing, LLC
Philadelphia, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LANE FISHER
LANE FISHER FISHER ZUCKER LLC21 S 21ST STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant and catering services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 200 8th Avenue Restaurant Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Thursday Enterprise, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Thursday Enterprise, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Thursday Enterprise, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Security Atlantic Leasing, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named CUBA LIBRE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 21, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 21, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 24, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |