Drawing for ROCK'N'ROLLS ROYAL FAMILY-HOLY MISSIONARY LEGACY OF THE ROSE

USPTO serial 76403398

ROCK'N'ROLLS ROYAL FAMILY-HOLY MISSIONARY LEGACY OF THE ROSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ROCK'N'ROLLS ROYAL FAMILY-HOLY MISSIONARY LEGACY OF THE ROSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Live Performance / Advertising / EtcACTIVEMay 10, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 13, 2003ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jun 25, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance