Drawing for ORBITZSAVER

USPTO serial 76403468

ORBITZSAVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORBITZSAVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sana Hakim, Esq.

LAUREL V DINEFF DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED160 N WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for transportation; providing information concerning travel, travel news and travel-related topics via electronic communications networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 22, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 9, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 12, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 11, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 10, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance