USPTO serial 76404296
RUBICON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RUBICON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONN K. HARMS
DONN K HARMS PATENT & TRADEMARK LAW CTR12702 VIA CORTINA, STE 100DEL MAR, CA 92014UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | racing and performance after market automobile interior parts, namely, seats, headrest, safety upholstery, safety nets, safety belts for automobile seats, and fittings for the same | ACTIVE | Jan 12, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 9, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |