Drawing for DJU

USPTO serial 76404762

DJU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DJU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brad D. Rose, Esq.

BRAD D ROSE ESQ PRYOR CASHMAN SHERMAN & FLYNN410 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Facial makeup, concealers, blushers, facial powders, foundation makeup, eye makeup, eye pencils, eyebrow pencils, mascara, false eyelashes, cosmetic pencils, lipstick, lip gloss, lip pencils, makeup removers, makeup applicators, in the nature of cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes, facial cleansers, toners, facial exfoliants, facial creams, facial lotions and non-medicated facial treatments, nail care preparations, nail polishes, nail polish removers, nail creams, hand creams, bath beads, bath crystals, bath foam, bath gels, bath oils, bath salts, body cleansers, body fragrances, body lotions, body conditioners, body gels, body powders, body exfoliants, body creams, sunscreen preparations, suntanning preparations, self-tanning preparations, after-sun lotions, perfumes, colognes, toothpaste, deodorant; hair care products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, mousse, gels and creams; cosmeticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 31, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 3, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 7, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 19, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance