USPTO serial 76405355
PLAS-AID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLAS-AID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Felix J. D'Ambrosio
FELIX J D'AMBROSIO JONES, TULLAR & COOPER, PCP O BOX 2266 EADS STATIONARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Metal working machines; Cargo handling machines; Cargo handling apparatus, namely, pneumatic conveyors; Chemical machines and apparatus, namely, dryers, mixers, scrubbers, granulators, and crushers; Plastic processing machines, namely, plastic molds | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Physical and chemical apparatus and instruments, namely, hygrostats and thermostats | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Furnace boilers; Feed hot water heaters; Drying apparatus, namely, heat air ventilation dryers; Refrigerating machines and equipment, namely, coolers and refrigerators; Heat exchangers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2006 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |