Drawing for HAIR OF THE DOG

USPTO serial 76405390

HAIR OF THE DOG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAIR OF THE DOG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shari L. Klevens

SHARI L KLEVENS MCKENNA & CUNEO LLP1900 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005dietary supplements, namely, vitamin, mineral and herbal supplements for treatment of headache and dehydrationACTIVENov 30, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2005PRRDPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED—
Jun 8, 2005PRRRPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Dec 22, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 1, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 2, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 29, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance