USPTO serial 76405390
HAIR OF THE DOG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HAIR OF THE DOG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shari L. Klevens
SHARI L KLEVENS MCKENNA & CUNEO LLP1900 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | dietary supplements, namely, vitamin, mineral and herbal supplements for treatment of headache and dehydration | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2005 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |