USPTO serial 76405663
COMIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sorel, Quebec J3P 5N6, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mr. Michael Sajovec
F MICHAEL SAJOVEC MYERS BIGEL SIBLEY & SAJOVECPO BOX 37428RALEIGH, NC 27627UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Aggregates composed of manufactured sand used for sandblast cleaning | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |