USPTO serial 76405847
EQUATOR PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EQUATOR PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Matraville, NSW 2036, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel P. Burke, Esq.
DANIEL P BURKE ESQ GALGANO & BURKE300 RABRO DR STE 135HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | WEAR DETECTION DEVICES FOR DETECTING WEAR IN JOINTS IN A HUMAN OR ANIMAL; LASER AND PULSE EMITTING DEVICES WHICH INTERACT WITH JOINT IMPLANTS TO ENABLE DETECTION OF JOINT SURFACE WEAR; DEVICES AND ASSEMBLIES FOR MEASURING JOINT WEAR WITH REFERENCE TO A PERIOD OF TIME FOR REFLECTION OF A SIGNAL, PULSE OR LASER, MONITORING DEVICES COMPRISING MICROCHIPS FOR USE IN MONITORING THE CONDITION OF SKELETAL JOINTS AND JOINT BEHAVIOR PARAMETERS IN ANIMAL AND HUMAN JOINTS; MONITORING DEVICES COMPRISING MICRO CHIPS FOR IMPLANTATION IN OR NEAR SKELETAL JOINTS FOR MONITORING THE CONDITION OF A JOINT OR JOINT BEHAVIOR PARAMETERS; MONITORING DEVICES COMPRISING MICROCHIPS FOR INCLUSION IN JOINT PROSTHESES FOR MONITORING JOINT CONDITION AND JOINT BEHAVIOR PARAMETERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | SURGICAL, MEDICAL AND VETERINARY APPARATUS, NAMELY ORTHOPAEDIC INSTRUMENTS AND ARTICLES, NAMELY SURGICAL PROSTHESES FOR JOINTS OF HUMAN AND ANIMAL BODIES COMPRISING HIP, KNEE AND SHOULDER PROSTHESES; PROSTHESES FOR IMPLANTATION IN SKELETAL JOINTS; ACETABULAR PROSTHESES AND ACETABULAR CUPS; MONITORING DEVICES COMPRISING MICROCHIPS FOR USE IN MONITORING THECONDITION OF SKELETAL JOINTS AND JOINT BEHAVIOR PARAMETERS IN ANIMAL AND HUMAN JOINTS; MONITORING DEVICES COMPRISING MICRO CHIPS FOR IMPLANTATION IN OR NEAR SKELETAL JOINTS FOR MONITORING THE CONDITION OF A JOINT OR JOINT BEHAVIOR PARAMETERS; MONITORING DEVICES COMPRISING MICROCHIPS FOR INCLUSION IN JOINT PROSTHESES FOR MONITORING JOINT CONDITION AND JOINT BEHAVIOR PARAMETERS; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, REAMERS, CUTTERS AND INSERTION TOOLS FOR INSERTION OF PROSTHESES AND MONITORING DEVICES IN ANIMALS AND HUMANS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2003 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |