Drawing for RAIN FOREST TILAPIA

USPTO serial 76406229

RAIN FOREST TILAPIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAIN FOREST TILAPIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daina J. Nathanson

DAINA J NATHANSON DRUMMOND WOODSUM & MACMAHON245 COMMERCIAL STPORTLAND, ME 04101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029FishACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 28, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 29, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 3, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 26, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Sep 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 27, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jun 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 5, 2004RECGACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED
Jan 9, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 9, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 14, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Oct 29, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Sep 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 25, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 1, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 3, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance