USPTO serial 76406229
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Fort Lauderdale, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daina J. Nathanson
DAINA J NATHANSON DRUMMOND WOODSUM & MACMAHON245 COMMERCIAL STPORTLAND, ME 04101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fish | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2004 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |