USPTO serial 76406266
DIVISION 4
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3115598Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 18, 2006
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIVISION 4?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason E. Baker
JASON E BAKER KEEGAN MACALUSO & BAKER4180 LA JOLLA VILLAGE DR STE 450LA JOLLA, CA 92037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, HEADWEAR AND FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, PANTS, SHORTS, SWEATPANTS, SWIMWEAR, SOCKS, UNDERWEAR, BELTS AND JACKETS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Feb 20, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |