Drawing for MAKETHELEAP

USPTO serial 76406420

MAKETHELEAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAKETHELEAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John P. Courtney

JOHN P COURTNEY ANDREWS & KURTH LLP600 TRAVIS STE 4200HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for system utilities, for word processing, for accounting packages, computer software for searching, compiling, indexing and organizing information on computer databases, computer software for electronic mail and work group communications over computer networks and computer software for creating indexes of information, indexes of websites and indexes of other information resources, client/server architecture, relational database integration, database management, data access, data control, and graphic user interface for business applications, computer software for constructing downloadable software applications to assist in business management processesACTIVE—
035Business consultation and rental of advertising space, providing information in the field of business management by means of hyperlinks to a directory of business management services and products available over the InternetACTIVE—
036Financial services, namely, financial consultationACTIVE—
041Publishing of electronic publications of others on websites featuring business management consulting services; entertainment in the nature of live musical groups; entertainment services, namely, music shows distributed over television, satellite, audio and video media; musical services, namely, musical composition and transcription for others; live music concerts; music publishing services; entertainment services namely live performances by a musical band; rental of musical instrumentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 22, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 22, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 31, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 11, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 15, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 4, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 27, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 10, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 16, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 5, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 2, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 31, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 24, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 4, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 3, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 30, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 14, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 17, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance