USPTO serial 76406856
IBRUSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IBRUSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric P. Schellin, Esq.
ERIC P SCHELLIN ESQ2121 CRYSTAL DR STE 704ARLINGTON, VA 22202-3706UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | DENTAL INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, APPLICATORS OF LIQUIDS FOR COATING TEETH | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |