USPTO serial 76406881
PREVENTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PREVENTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin G. Smith
KEVIN G SMITH SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PROCESSED NUTS; PROCESSED, FRESH AND FROZEN FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; WHEY BASED, SOY BASED AND DAIRY BASED FOOD BEVERAGES; BUTTER SUBSTITUTES, CHEESE SUBSTITUTES, EGG SUBSTITUTES AND MEAT SUBSTITUTES; DRIED FRUIT AND VEGETABLE CHIPS AND SNACK FOODS; FROZEN, PREPARED AND PACKAGED ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, FISH, POULTRY AND VEGETABLES; PROTEIN FOR USE AS A FOOD ADDITIVE | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | HERBAL FOOD BEVERAGES; BREAKFAST CEREALS; CHEWING GUM; FLOUR AND GRAIN BASED CHIPS AND SNACK FOODS; READY TO EAT CEREAL DERIVED FOOD BARS; CANDIED FRUIT SNACKS; PROCESSED HERBS; CEREAL BASED, RICE BASED, GRANOLA BASED AND WHEAT BASED SNACK FOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | FRUIT JUICE AND FRUIT JUICE CONCENTRATES; VEGETABLE JUICE; MINERAL AND SPRING WATER; SPORTS DRINKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rodale Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Rodale Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named PREVENTION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |