USPTO serial 76406942
EDGAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 12, 2006
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with EDGAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $2,550
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC, US
Other trademarks owned by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC, US
Other trademarks owned by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC, US
Other trademarks owned by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Hsiao
100 F Street, N.E.Mail Stop 9305Washington, DC 20549Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in the compiling, editing, validating, and transmitting of electronic filings to the US Securities and Exchange Commission; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of manuals for computer software for use in the compiling, editing, validating, and transmitting of electronic filings to the US Securities and Exchange Commission | ACTIVE | Dec 12, 1990 |
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, manuals for computer software for use in the compiling, editing, validating, and transmitting of electronic filings to the US Securities and Exchange Commission | ACTIVE | Dec 12, 1990 |
| 036 | Financial information provided by electronic means, namely, the receipt, acceptance, compilation, and dissemination of information in the nature of financial filings, financial disclosures, and other submissions made to the US Securities and Exchange Commission | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
- Other trademarks owned by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
- Other trademarks owned by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named EDGAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 8, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 8, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |